Influence of heat stress to matrix on bone formation

Para aqueles interessados em pesquisar o efeito das altas temperaturas de frezagem sobre o processo de regeneração/reparação  óssea, vale o artigo abaixo como estudo preliminar. 
 
Influence of heat stress to matrix on bone formation
Keiko Yoshida, Katsumi Uoshima, Kimimitsu Oda, Takeyasu Maeda

Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 782–790. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01654.x

Keiko Yoshida, Oral Implant Clinic, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan 

Katsumi Uoshima, General Dentistry and Clinical Education Unit, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan

Kimimitsu Oda, Divisions of Oral Biochemistry, Department of Oral Biological Sciences, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan

Takeyasu Maeda, Divisions of Oral Anatomy, Department of Oral Biological Sciences, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Niigata, Japan

Objectives: It is important to know the etiology of implant failure. It has been reported that heat stress during drilling was one of the causes for failure and the threshold was 47 C. However, clinically, we encounter cases in which overheating does not seem to affect osseointegration eventually. The purpose of this study was to assess histologically the spatio-temporal effect of heat stress on bone formation after overheating the

bone matrix. 

Material and methods: Rat calvarial bone was heated to 37C, 43C, 45C and 48C for 15 min by a temperature stimulator. Paraffin sections were prepared 1, 3 and 5 weeks after heating and investigated histologically under light microscopy. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteopontin (OPN), heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) and heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) immunohistochemistry and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) enzyme histochemistry were carried out. The area of dead osteocytes was calculated and statistically analyzed. Apoptotic osteocytes were detected by the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) method. 

Results: Along with the temperature increase, the area of dead osteocytes increased and regeneration of the periosteal membrane was delayed. Hsps- and TUNEL-positive cells were only seen in the 48 C group. Spatio-temporal changes of TRAP- and ALP-positive cell numbers were observed, while OPN expression was mostly absent. Even after 48C stimulation, bone formation on the calvarial surface was observed after 5 weeks. 

Conclusions: Although there was a temperature-dependent delay in bone formation after heat stress, the 48 C heat stress did not obstruct bone formation eventually. This delay was probably caused by slow periosteal membrane regeneration

Key words: bone formation, heat stress, osteoblast, osteocyte, periosteal membrane